Recruiting Intelligence

A recruit has not played a college snap. So the band is the point.

A prospect is run on the College engine in its high-school configuration, a projection at the widest bands the engine makes, with the service stars as an outside input.

Case 01 · a rating is a projection, not a measurement

Project onto the college scale, trust the tools, band it wide.

A composite prospect who has not played a college snap. He runs on the College engine in its high-school configuration, and the output is a projection onto the college scale, never a locked present-tense rating.

Tools and athletic traitsTrusted most, the translatable measurables.1.00
Translatable frame and lengthTrusted, the room the projection rests on.0.72
High-school productionTrusted least, it came against uneven competition and does not translate cleanly.0.30
74.0Projected KR, onto the college scaleINFERRED-heavy
6065 to 83, median 7490
The widest band the engine produces: young, Frame-Upside-flagged, and thin-data at once
The high-school projection, a prior
College production lands, the evidence
The projection is retired, replaced by the anchored college read

The projection never produces a locked OVERALL on its own, and the moment real college production lands the evidence resolves the prior and the projection is retired (replaced, not averaged). A recruiting rating and a college rating are different objects even at the same number. The honest form of the projection is its band.

Illustrative on the real HS configuration (the College engine in high-school config, the projection onto the college scale, the tools-trust extreme, the widest-bands rule, the projection-as-prior). Composite prospect, demonstration figures.

Case 02 · the stars are an input, not the answer

Reason from the data to the trait, never backward from a ranking.

A composite prospect the recruiting services have already ranked. The engine does not read the ranking and reason backward from it. It reasons from the data to the trait, and then it reconciles against the board.

The KaNeXT projection
Reasoned from the data to the trait. The engine's output.
The recruiting stars
A Scout Overlay input, a signal to reconcile against. Never the engine's number.
The recruiting stars, the national rankings, and the all-star billing never set a trait or an anchor. They are stored as provenance metadata, and at most they shift the prior probability that a player's true ability exceeds his production. Reason from the data to the trait, never backward from a known name.
Engine higher
The under-recruited three-star: a projection above the board, the find.
Engine lower
The over-ranked five-star: a projection below the board, the name the market overpaid for.

The divergence is where a recruiting operation makes its money, and the engine surfaces the agreement score and the divergence findings rather than laundering the star rating into its number. The overlay can raise a trait's confidence, but it can never move the projection. The stars tell you what the market thinks, the projection what the data says, and the space between is the edge.

Illustrative on the real Scout Overlay mechanics (competitor ratings as inputs never the output, the no-pedigree rule, the reason-from-data-to-trait discipline, the divergence-as-finding). Composite prospect, demonstration figures.

Case 03 · the boom, the bust, and the program

Frame upside makes the widest bets, and the program bends them.

A composite recruit resting on Frame Upside, the projection the engine is least certain about and most interested in. Frame Upside is set for a young prospect with room to add mass or physical scores below the bar with room to grow.

Frame UpsideIt flags projectable athletic upside, distinct from the skill development every young player gets, reported with wide bands and a re-evaluate-each-offseason note because the physical ceiling is unknown until reached. It never modifies a current score, it widens and lifts the projection. Recruiting is where Frame Upside matters most.
Boom or bust
Rests on upside and high-developability tools. A wide band, and a known long shot: a high ceiling and a real floor risk.
6062 to 87, median 7490
Safer floor
Rests on traits already at the college bar. A tighter band, and a lower ceiling.
6071 to 82, median 7690
A strong developmental programLifts the developability rate and tightens the band.
6072 to 82, median 7790
A weak programLowers it and widens the band.
6065 to 84, median 7390

The developability tiers do the sorting the eye cannot, a board that knows which is which allocates its offers and money accordingly, and none of it is a promise, all of it is a distribution. The engine makes the odds. The staff makes the offer.

Illustrative on the real projection-shaping layer (the Frame Upside physical projection, the developability sort, the program re-pricing). Composite prospects and programs, demonstration figures.

The law underneath
A recruit is a projection. The confidence is the product.

Report the projection and the band that is most of the truth in it, and let the staff make the wager.

Project honestly, band it wide.

Recruiting Intelligence projects a high-school prospect onto the college scale as a banded bet, treats the recruiting stars as an input and not an answer, sorts the boom from the safe by developability, and re-prices the projection by the program, never handing back a false-precision number.

Request access